President Barack Obama’s governance – observations & opinions

* Democrats should pass the stimulus bill they believe in and dare the obstructionist Senate Republicans to filibuster

Posted by Lew Weinstein on February 9, 2009

Paul Krugman writes in the NYT (2-9-09) …

  • Even if the original Obama plan — around $800 billion in stimulus, with a substantial fraction of that total given over to ineffective tax cuts — had been enacted, it wouldn’t have been enough to fill the looming hole in the U.S. economy, which the Congressional Budget Office estimates will amount to $2.9 trillion over the next three years.
  • One of the best features of the original plan was aid to cash-strapped state governments, which would have provided a quick boost to the economy while preserving essential services. But the centrists insisted on a $40 billion cut in that spending.
  • The original plan also included badly needed spending on school construction; $16 billion of that spending was cut. It included aid to the unemployed, especially help in maintaining health care — cut. Food stamps — cut.
  • All in all, more than $80 billion was cut from the plan, with the great bulk of those cuts falling on precisely the measures that would do the most to reduce the depth and pain of this slump.
  • But how did this happen? I blame President Obama’s belief that he can transcend the partisan divide — a belief that warped his economic strategy.
  • Mr. Obama’s postpartisan yearnings may also explain why he didn’t do something crucially important: speak forcefully about how government spending can help support the economy.
  • And Mr. Obama got nothing in return for his bipartisan outreach. Not one Republican voted for the House version of the stimulus plan.
  • Mr. Obama may be able to come back for a second round. But this was his best chance to get decisive action, and it fell short.

LMW COMMENT

President Obama’s first attempt to engage Republicans in a bipartisan approach to the stimulus package has failed. Republicans refused to support the bill or offer constructive alternatives other than their tired mantra of cutting taxes which they view as a way to reduce government, but which instead led to the trillion dollar deficits and the de-regulation disasters of the Bush years.

Will this failure get reversed in the joint committee? I doubt it. The Republicans smell blood and are more than willing to tromp on the national interest in the pursuit of damage to Obama and hope for their election success in 2010 and 2012.

The country very much wants an end to partisan bickering, but no such end is in sight. Maybe the country will reject the re-election bids of those obstructionist Republican who are so focused on political infighting. Based on the past week or so, I think that’s more likely than Obama winning them over to a more responsible approach. Perhaps I’ll be pleasantly surprised.

Meanwhile the Democrats in Congress should pass the stimulus bill they (and the President) believe in, and just dare the Senate Republicans to filibuster.

Read the entire column at … http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/09/opinion/09krugman.html?ref=opinion

6 Responses to “* Democrats should pass the stimulus bill they believe in and dare the obstructionist Senate Republicans to filibuster”

  1. jonolan said

    Or maybe Americans will reject the re-election bids of these spendaholic, Liberal, Socialist Democrats…

  2. Lew Weinstein said

    Thanks for your comment and welcome to our blog. If the stimulus works, and Republicans are seen to have opposed it, they will be trounced at the polls. If the stimulus doesn’t work, we are all in a heap of trouble. But the worst case of all would be to fail to try.

  3. jonolan said

    I disagree. I think the best thing we could do would be “to fail to try.” The market grew swollen and bloated on fictional monies. It has now contracted – painfully. That is self-correcting. i believe that attempts to use government spending to fix the problem will only stifle the recovery and hinder private investment in the future.

  4. Joe said

    I agree with Jonolan.

  5. Joe said

    It took President Bush 8 years to produce a 2.9 trillion doller deficit. That included 2 wars, 9-11, Katrina, and a inherited recession. President Bush’s tax cuts produced the most government revenue in out nations history. Obama will add 3.2 trillion dollars in a year and a half. We need tax cuts to stimulate the country. Just like Bush, Clinton, and Reagan did.

    Socialism is great…
    until it will run out of money.
    Hahahaha

  6. euandus said

    I have noticed that some bloggers are questioning whether we should continue to have a Senate, partly because of the filibuster. I just wrote a post on the U.S. Senate itself. I argue that it was designed with discordant goals and that it should be more like the European Council in the EU in representing State governments. Here is the link (in case you are interested): http://euandus3.wordpress.com/2009/10/27/the-u-s-senate-what-is-it-really/

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>